CP-LUHNA logo

Search the CP-LUHNA Web pages

tools_sm.gif (5199 bytes)

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

Archaeoastronomy

BIOLOGICAL

Packrat Middens
Amphibians and Reptiles
Arthropods
Birds
Dung
Mammals
Pollen

CHRONOLOGICAL

Dendrochronology
Fire Scars
Radiocarbon Dating
Other Techniques

GEOGRAPHICAL

GIS
Remote Sensing

GEOLOGICAL

Stratigraphic Sediments
Geomorphology
Volcanism
Glaciers

HISTORICAL

Land Surveys
Written Histories
Repeat Photography
Stream Gaging

ToolsRemote Sensing

Source: Berlin, G. L. 1998.  The Remote Sensing Pages. http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~geog-p/geog/RemoteSensing/. 1/13/01.

Remote sensing is defined as the technique of obtaining information about objects through the analysis of data collected by special instruments that are not in physical contact with the objects of investigation. As such, remote sensing can be regarded as "reconnaissance from a distance," "teledetection," or a form of the common adage "look but don't touch." Remote sensing thus differs from in situ sensing, where the instruments are immersed in, or physically touch, the objects of measurement. A common examples of an in situ instrument is the soil thermometer.

Traditionally, the energy collected and measured in remote sensing has been electromagnetic radiation, including visible light and invisible thermal infrared (heat) energy, which is reflected or emitted in varying degrees by all natural and synthetic objects. The scope of remote sensing has been recently broadened to include acoustical or sound energy, which is propagated under water. With the inclusion of these two different forms of energy, the human eye and ear are examples of remote sensing data collection devices.

wavelength.jpg (34445 bytes)

Source: http://www.for.nau.edu/geography/RemoteSensing/images/wavelength.jpg

The instruments used for this special technology are known as remote sensors and include photographic cameras, mechanical scanners, and imaging radar systems. Regardless of type, they are designed to both collect and record specific types of energy that impinges upon them. Remote sensing devices can be differentiated in terms of whether they are active or passive. Active systems, such as radar and sonar, beam artificially produced energy to a target and record the reflected component. Passive systems, including the photographic camera, detect only energy emanating naturally from an object, such as reflected sunlight or thermal infrared emissions. Today, remote sensors, excluding sonar devices, are typically carried on aircraft and earth-orbiting spacecraft, which has led to the familiar phrase "eye in the sky." Sonar systems propagate acoustical energy through water for the reconnaissance of subaqueous features.

To complete the remote sensing process, the data captured and recorded by remote sensing systems must be analyzed by interpretive and measurement techniques in order to provide useful information about the subjects of investigation. These techniques are diverse, ranging from traditional methods of visual interpretation to methods using sophisticated computer processing. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that data is not information. Accordingly, the two major components of remote sensing are data capture and data analysis."

The Need For A Name

By the early 1960s, many new types of remote sensing devices were being introduced that could detect electromagnetic radiation in spectral regions far beyond the range of human vision and photographic film. This was also a time when many in the scientific community had great hopes for earth observations from orbiting satellites on a routine basis. To encompass these concepts, the term "remote sensing" was coined by Evelyn L. Pruitt, a geographer formerly with the Office of Naval Research, to replace the more limiting terms "aerial" and "photograph". The new term, promoted throughout a series of symposia at the Willow Run Laboratories of the University of Michigan, gained immediate and widespread acceptance.

Although the term remote sensing has a recent origin, the technique has been used by humans since the dawn of our history. Every time we sense our surroundings with out eye-brain system we are determining the size, shape, and color of objects from a distance by collecting and analyzing reflected visible light. In a similar manner, certain poisonous snakes use special heat sensors to perceive impressions of their surrounding environment, and bats use sound echoes to navigate and detect prey.

For more information on the Remote Sensing Program at Northern Arizona University, contact G. L. Berlin.

For a discussion of how remote sensing techniques are being used in archaeological studies, including studies at Chaco Canyon on the Colorado Plateau, click here.


Resources:

Allen, C. D., Betancourt, J. L. and Swetnam, T. W. 1998. Landscape changes in the southwestern United States: Techniques, long-term data sets and trends. Pp. 71-84 In: Sisk, T. D., editor. Perspectives on the land use history of North America: A context for understanding our changing environment. Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR-1998-0003. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Reston, VA.

Baker, V. R. 1987. Fluvial paleohydrology of the southern Colorado Plateau, Arizona and Utah. Pp. 18-19 In: Hawkins, R. H., Wobber, F. J. and Springer, E. P., editors. Remote sensing-arid lands workshop. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Washington, D.C.

Berlin, G. L., Ambler, R., Hevly, R. H. and Schaber, G. G. 1977. Identification of a Sinagua agricultural field by aerial thermography, soil chemistry, pollen/plant analysis, and archaeology. American Antiquity 42: 588-600.

Ellenwood, J. R. 1994. Monitoring long-term change of vegetation with historical inventories on the Kaibab National Forest. In: Greer, J. D., editor. Remote sensing and ecosystem management: Proceedings of the fifth Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Portland, OR.

Everitt, J. H. and Deloach, C. J. 1990. Remote sensing of Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) and associated vegetation. Weed Science 38: 273-278.

Everitt, J. H., Escobar, D. E. and Alaniz, M. A. 1996. Using spatial information technologies to map Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) infestations. Weed Science 44: 194-201.

Hewitt, M. J., III 1990. Synoptic inventory of riparian ecosystems: The utility of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Forest Ecology and Management 33/34: 605.

Johnson, L. B. 1990. Analyzing spatial and temporal phenomena using geographic information systems: A review of ecological applications. Landscape Ecology 4: 31-43.

Kasischke, E. S., Melack, J. M. and Dobson, M. C. 1997. The use of imaging radars for ecological applications - a review. Remote Sensing of Environment 59: 141.

Lee, K. 1988. Remote sensing study in support of mineral resource appraisal of Wilderness Study Areas near Moab, Utah. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO.

Lee, C. T. and Marsh, S. E. 1995. The use of archival Landsat MSS and ancillary data in a GIS environment to map historical change in an urban riparian habitat. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61: 999-1008.

Liedtke, J., Roberts, A. and Luternauer, J. 1995. Practical remote sensing of suspended sediment concentrations. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61: 167-176.

Loose, R. W. and Lyons, T. R. 1976. The Chetro Ketl field: A planned water control system in Chaco Canyon. Pp. 13-36 In: Lyons, T. R., editor. Remote sensing experiments in cultural resource studies: Non-destructive methods of archaeological exploration, survey, and analysis. Reports of the Chaco Center, No. 1. Chaco Center, National Park Service and University of New Mexico, Albuquerqure.

Loveland, T. R. and Hutcheson, H. L. 1995. Monitoring changes in landscapes from satellite imagery. Pp. 530 In: LaRoe, E. T., Farris, G. S., Puckett, C. E., Doran, P. D. and M.J. Mac, editors. Our living resources: A report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

Lyons, T. R., editor. 1976. Remote sensing experiments in cultural resource studies: Non-destructive methods of archaeological exploration, survey and analysis. Reports of the Chaco Center, No. 1. Chaco Center, National Park Service, and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Mattikalli, N. M., DeVereux, B. J. and Richards, K. S. 1996. Prediction of river discharge and surface water quality using an integrated geographical information system approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 683.

National Park Service 1997. Baseline water quality data inventory and analysis: Chaco Culture National Historical Park. National Parks Service, Water Resouces Division, Fort Collins, CO, 291 pp.

Nemani, R. and Running, S. 1997. Land cover characterization using multitemporal red, near-IR and thermal-IR data from NOAA/AVHRR. Ecological Applications 7: 79-90.

Potter, L. D. and Kelley, N. E. 1980. Aerial photointerpretation of vegetation of Chaco Canyon National Monument. In: Cultural resources remote sensing. Cultural Resources Management Division, National Park Service, Washington, D.C.

Price, K. P. 1993. Detection of soil erosion within pinyon-juniper woodlands using thematic mapper (TM) data. Remote Sensing of Environment 45: 233-248.

Pucherelli, M. J. 1986. Evaluation of riparian vegetative trends in the Grand Canyon using multitemporal remote sensing techniques. USBR, Salt Lake City, UT.

Quattrochi, D. A. and Pelletier, R. E. 1991. Remote sensing for analysis of landscapes: An introduction. Pp. 17-76 In: Turner and Gardner, editors. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Ramsey, R. D., Born, J. D., Homer, C. G. and Edwards, T. C., Jr. 1992. Thematic mapper vegetation mapping for the state of Utah. Pp. 148-157 In: Greer, J. D., editor. Remote sensing and natural resource management. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.

Ramsey, R. D., Homer, C. G. and Edwards, T. C., Jr. 1993. Gap analysis land cover map for the state of Utah: A hierarchiacal data base. Pp. 298-306 In: GIS, photogrammetry and modeling: Looking to the future with an eye on the past. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.

Ramsey, R. D., Falconer, A. and Jensen, J. R. 1995. The relationship between NOAA-AVHRR NDVI and ecoregions in Utah. Remote Sensing of Environment 53: 188-198.

Sample, V. A., editor. 1994. Remote sensing and GIS in ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 369 pp.

Sever, Tom. Archaeological Remote Sensing at Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/archeology/remote_sensing.html 9/23/99.

USGS/EROS. 2001 Earth Observing System. http://edcimswww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/imswelcome/. 1/13/01.

Van West, C. R. 1991. Reconstructing prehistoric climatic variability and agricultural production in southwestern Colorado, A.D. 901-1300: A GIS approach. Pp. 25-34 In: Hutchinson, A., Smith, J. E. and Usher, J., editors. Proceedings of the Anasazi Symposium 1991. Mesa Verde Museum Association, Inc., Mesa Verde, CO.

Wagner, D. 1991. Analysis of prehistoric roadways in Chaco Canyon using remotely sensed digital data. In: Trombold, C., editor. Ancient road networks and settlement hierarchies in the New World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.