|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
Ponderosa pine forest near Flagstaff, early 1900's. Note open structure and herbaceous understory. Courtesy of Cline Library Special Collections, Northern Arizona University. |
In the late 19th and early 20th century, visitors to Southwestern forests gave us our first indication of how these forests looked then, primarily from their written observations. Although there were exceptions, most descriptions portray, especially in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests, conditions that are much more open than what we see today (Whipple, 1856, U.S. Geological Survey, 1904, Cooper, 1960). A few pictures are available from this era, and they generally show the same thing. Groups of similarly sized trees with little understory but considerable grass beneath seem to have been the most common condition.
Fires burned frequently (2 to 10 years) at low intensity in lower elevations and less frequently but with moderate intensity at higher elevations (Swetnam and Baisan, 1996). Lightning is common in the Southwest, and Native Americans also contributed to fire frequency. Escaped domestic fires occurred as did intentional burning, although burning by Native Americans has not been documented in the SW to the degree it has further north (Swetnam and Baisan, 1996).
In 1910, Woolsey and also Lang and Stewart gave us the first quantified inventories. Neither inventory was Southwest-wide, and they do not give us a picture of conditions on a same-acreage, statistically sound basis. Nevertheless, they covered several areas and included a large number of plots, so they paint the best quantified picture available today of early 20th-century conditions. They agree with a) early photographs, b) early descriptions mentioned above, c) what a forester or ecologist would expect to find given knowledge of fire regimes, and d) what studies of stumps and other factors indicate was present (Covington, and Moore, 1994a).
Table 1 shows trees per acre by diameter class from Woolsey's 1910 inventory. The table compares his figures with those from USDA - Forest Service inventories made in 1962 and again in 1985/87. Woolsey's inventory was from plots taken in typical stands on three National Forests in Arizona. The other two inventories were based on a plot-grid that covered all of Region-3: both Arizona and New Mexico. The information is grouped by 3-inch diameter classes.
Table 1. Trees per acre, by diameter class, from Southwest inventories.
| 3-INCH DBH CLASS | ACTUAL DBH RANGE | 1985/87 R3-AZNV | 1962 R3-INV | 1910 R3-INV |
| 6 | 4.6-7.5 | 68.0 | 45.0 | 6.3 |
| 9 | 7.6-10.5 | 36.1 | 21.8 | 3.2 |
| 12 | 10.6-13.5 | 18.1 | 11.1 | 2.5 |
| 15 | 13.6-16.5 | 8.8 | 6.6 | 2.2 |
| 18 | 16.6-19.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| 21 | 19.6-22.5 | 2.3 | * | 1.8 |
| 24 | 22.6-25.5 | 1.3 | * | 1.4 |
| 27 | 25.6-28.5 | 0.6 | * | 0.7 |
| 30 | 28.6+ | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| TOTAL | 140.0 | 93.6 | 20.8 |
Table Notes
R3 inventory figures are for conifers only.
Specific numbers for diameter classes marked with an "*" are not available: the 1962 inventory grouped these into a single category.
1910 data is from Woolsey, and was taken on the Coconino, Tusayan, and Prescott Forests
Woolsey's data were recently converted to basal area (BA) and show that average conditions in 1910 in ponderosa pine forests ranged from BA 22.9 square feet per acre (Tusayan Forest) to 25.4 (Prescott Forest) to 37.9 on the Coconino Forest. Other plots were taken in the best stands that could be found on several forests around Arizona and New Mexico and the average is a BA of 82.0 (Woolsey data converted to BA by the Forest Service). These are all well below today's densities, which are mostly above BA 100 per acre and often up to and even greater than 200 (Forest Service data).