Search the CP-LUHNA Web pages

Biota of the Colorado Plateau

Biotic Communities

Alpine Tundra
Subalpine Conifer Forest
Quaking Aspen Forest
Mixed Conifer Forest
Ponderosa Pine Forest
Montane Chaparral/Scrub
Pinyon-Juniper Woodland
Mountain Grasslands
Semi-arid Grasslands
Mountain Wetlands
Riparian Areas
Paleocommunities
Elevational Range
Merriam's Life Zones

Changes in the Biota

Endangered Species
California Condor
Endangered Fish
Mammal populations
Megafaunal Extinction
Invasive/Exotic Species
Forest Composition
Species Range Expansion
Species Extirpations
Status and Trends of Plants
Succession
Riparian Degradation
Loss of Beaver
Wildfire History and Ecology
Ponderosa Fire Ecology
Tamarisk Invasion

Agents of Biotic Change

biotaExotic and Invasive Species

Dalmation toadflax (Linaria dalmatica). Photo courtesy of  Chris Luginbuhl

Invasive plant and animal species–also referred to as exotics, non-natives, introduced, or nonindigenous species–are organisms which have expanded beyond their native range or have been introduced from other parts of the world. Some species were introduced into the wild intentionally, while others have been introduced unintentionally and expanded on their own.

Of particular concern on the Colorado Plateau are introduced weedy plants which are invading rangelands, forests, and riparian ecosystems at an alarming rate. Human activities such as grazing of livestock or logging, with its associated road networks, often disturb biotic communities enough to allow establishment and in some cases domination of invasive species. Control of infestations has been difficult, and the ecological consequences have been serious. Negative impacts include reduction in biodiversity, forage, habitat and aesthetic quality, and even soil productivity. The rapid expansion of exotic weed populations has been a deterrent to restoring native plant communities and re-establishing historic ecological conditions.

Tamarisk

Tamarisk thickets along the Colorado River near Moab. Photo 1999 Ray Wheeler.

Saltcedar or Tamarisk

One of the most important, and damaging, introduced species on the Colorado Plateau is saltcedar, or tamarisk. Eight species of this small riparian tree were purposely introduced in the western United States as ornamentals, for windbreaks, or to help control streambank erosion. Some of these species, principally Tamarix ramosissima, but also T. chinensis and T. parviflora, have established themselves in nearly every lower-elevation streambed from northern Mexico to southern Canada and now cover approximately 1.5 million acres.

Native riparian cottonwood/willow communities, which support some of the highest numbers of breeding bird species found in any vegetative community type in the United States, have declined dramatically as tamarisk has invaded. The plant, without any native checks, has replaced thousands of acres of riparian gallery forest, resulting in a significant decrease in biodiversity and ecosystem health along most of the Colorado Plateau's waterways. Click here for a more comprehensive essay on tamarisk by ecologist Dr. Larry Stevens.

Cheatgrass

Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) is a winter annual grass which originated in Europe and Asia (Eurasia) and came to our area in contaminated seed in the 1890s. By 1920, cheatgrass, or downy brome as it also is known, had invaded native semi-arid grasslands and open pinyon-juniper woodlands of the Colorado Plateau. Despite its early growth and rich color, cheatgrass is unpalatable to sheep and other livestock, which tend to overgraze native plants when it begins to prevail.

Most native bunchgrasses of the Colorado Plateau are perennial, whereas annual plants like cheatgrass grow from a seed, then flower, set seed, and die every year. Cheatgrass usually germinates in fall and grows during winter, opposite the cycle followed by common native perennial grasses. By the time the rain stops in spring, cheatgrass already is maturing its seeds. Unlike native bunchgrasses, cheatgrass then dies by the end of July, avoiding the hottest and driest part of summer.

Dead cheatgrass burns easily, causing early and abundant wildfires which tend to damage or kill native grasses. During a fire, early-maturing cheatgrass seeds can take advantage of many nutrients the fire releases to grow large and produce abundant seed (over a thousand per plant in some cases).

Because cheatgrass quickly develops a large root system in the spring, by the time native grass seedlings start to grow in April or May, cheatgrass has stolen most water out of the top foot of soil. Although mature native grasses can get water from lower soil regions, seedlings cannot get their roots deep enough into soil to access water before drought sets in, and thus, die of thirst. Without this ability to reproduce, native grasses inevitably decline, and so over time, cheatgrass becomes more and more common until eventually it dominates. Cheatgrass often opens the way for secondary invaders such as knapweed and thistle

Other harmful introduced species found in plant communities on the Colorado Plateau include Dalmation toadflax (Linaria dalmatica), leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula), and camelthorn (Alhagi pseudalhagi)), which is primarily spread by livestock grazing and wind.

Southwest Exotic Plant Information Clearinghouse (SWEPIC) is a cooperative effort among the U.S. Geological Survey, the National Park Service and Northern Arizona University to organize comprehensive information on exotic plant species in the southwest on one web location. SWEPIC is to help all people and organizations committed to protecting the ecological and economic values of southwest resources from degradation from harmful non-native weeds. The goal of SWEPIC is to provide reliable and organized information on the distribution and ecology of these weeds in the southwest, with an emphasis on forests, rangelands, and other natural areas.

References and Resources:

Barrows, C. W. 1993. Tamarisk control II: A success story. Restoration and Management Notes 11: 35-38.

Baum, B. R. 1967. Introduced and naturalized tamarisks in the United States and Canada [Tamaricaceae]. Baileya 15: 19-25.

Blinn, D. W., Runck, C., Clark, D. A. and Rinne, J. N. 1993. Effects of rainbow trout predation on Little Colorado spinedace. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122: 130-143.

Boydstun, C., Fuller, P. and Williams, J. D. 1995. Nonindigenous fish. Pp. 431433 In: LaRoe, E. T., Farris, G. S., Puckett, C. E., Doran, P. D. and Mac, M. J., editors. Our living resources: a report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, D.C.

Brock, J. H. 1994. Tamarix spp. (salt cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western USA. Pp. 27-44 In: de Waal, L. C., Child, L. E., Wade, P. M. and Brock, J. H., editors. Ecology and management of invasive riverside plants. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, NY.

Carothers, S. W. and Brown, B. T. 1991. The Colorado River through Grand Canyon: Natural history and human change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 235 pp.

Christensen, E. M. 1962. The rate of naturalization of Tamarix in Utah. American Midland Naturalist 68: 51-57.

Christensen, E. M. 1963. Naturalization of Russian olive in Utah. American Midland Naturalist 70: 133-137.

Clover, E. U. and Jotter, L. 1944. Floristic studies in the canyon of the Colorado and tributaries. American Midland Naturalist 32: 591-642.

Cooper, D. J., Merritt, D. M., Anderson, D. C. and Chimner, R. A. 1999. Factors controlling the establishment of Fremont cottonwood seedlings on the Upper Green River, USA. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 15: 419-440.

Crosby, A. 1993. Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe 900-1900. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

DeLoach, C. J. 1990. Prospects for biological control of salt cedar (Tamarix spp.) in riparian habitats of the southwestern United States. Pp. 307-314 In: Delfosse, E. S., editor. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on biological control of weeds.

Douglas, E. 1954. Phreatophytes: Water hogs of the west. Land Improvement 1: 8-12.

Everitt, B. L. 1998. Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande. Wetlands 18: 658-668.

Flather, C. H., Joyce, L. A. and Bloomgarden, C. A. 1994. Species endangerment patterns in the United States. General Technical Report RM-241. U.S. Forest Service, 42 pp.

Floyd-Hanna, M. L. and Romme, W. 1993. Biological invasions after fire, Mesa Verde National Park. Park Science 29: 12-14.

Fornasari, L. 1997. Host specificity of Coniatus tamarisci (Coleoptera: Curculiondae) from France: Potential biological control agent of Tamarix spp. in the United States. Environmental Entomology 26: 349-356.

Gay, L. W. and Hartman, R. K. 1982. ET (evapotranspiration) measurements over riparian saltcedar on the Colorado River. Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest 12: 9-16.

Graf, W. F. 1978. Fluvial adjustment to the spread of tamarisk in the Colorado Plateau region. Geological Society of America Bulletin 89: 1491-1501.

Hagemeyer, J. and Waisel, Y. 1989. Influence of NaCl, Cd(NO3)2 and air humidity on transpiration of Tamarix aphylla. Physiologia Plantarum 75: 280-284.

Horton, J. S. 1964. Notes on the introduction of deciduous Tamarisk [into the U.S.A.]. Research Note RM-16. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO.

Horton, J. S. 1977. The development and perpetuation of the permanent tamarisk type in the phreatophyte zone of the southwest. Pp. 124-127 In: Importance, preservation, and management of riparian habitat: A symposium. General Technical Report RM-43. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C.

Horton, J. S. and Campbell, C. J. 1974. Management of phreatophyte and riparian vegetation for maximum multiple use values.Research Paper RM-117. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.

Hughes, L. E. 1993. 'The devil's own-tamarisk. Rangelands 15: 151-155.

Hunter, W. C., Ohmart, R. D. and Anderson, B. W. 1988. Use of exotic saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) by birds in arid riparian systems. The Condor 90: 113-123.

Irvine, J. R. and West, N. E. 1979. Riparian tree species distribution and succession along the lower Escalante River, Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 24: 331-346.

Jacono, C.C., and C.P. Boydstun. 1998. Proceedings of the workshop on databases for nonindigenous plants, Gainesville, FL, September 24-25, 1997. (Revised November, 1998). <http://nas.er.usgs.gov/publications/plants/plant_workshop/npwrkshp/introduct.html> 9/12/00.

Kovalev, O. V., Zaitzev, V. F. and Hoffmann, J. H. 1996. A new theoretical approach to the selection of promising agents for biological weed control. Pp. 283-285 In: Moran, V. C., editor. Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on biological control of weeds, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 19-26 January 1996. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.

Kunzmann, M. R., Johnson, R. R. and Bennett, P. S., editors. 1989. Tamarisk control in southwestern United States: Proceedings of tamarisk conference, University of Arizona, Tucson, September 2-3, 1987. Special Report No. 9. Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit/University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Miller, R. R. 1961. Man and the changing fish fauna of the American Southwest. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 46: 365-404.

Miller, W. H., Tyus, H. M. and Carlson, C. A. 1982. Fishes of the upper Colorado River system: Present and future. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.

Molles, M. 1980. The impacts of habitat alterations and introduced species on the native fishes of the upper Colorado River basin. Pp. 163-181 In: Spofford, W. O., Jr., Parker, A. L. and Kneese, A. V., editors. Energy development in the southwest. Research Paper 18. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.

Nature Convervancy, The. 2000. Wildland Invasive Species Program. <http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/> 9/12/00.

Olson, T. E. and Knopf, F. L. 1986. Naturalization of russian-olive in the western United States. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 1: 65-69.

Potter, L. D. and Pattison, N. B. 1976. Shoreline ecology of Lake Powell. Lake Powell Research Project Bulletin No. 29. University of California, Los Angeles.

Robinson, T. W. 1958. Phreatophytes. Water Supply Paper 1423. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., 82 pp.

Robinson, T. W. 1964. Phreatophyte research in the western states, March 1959 to July 1964.Circular 495. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.

Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, spread and areal extent of saltcedar (Tamarix) in the western states.Professional paper 491-A. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.

Schmidt, J. C., Webb, R. H., Valdez, R. A., Marzolf, G. R. and Stevens, L. 1998. Science and values in river restoration in the Grand Canyon. BioScience 48: 735-748.

Sobhian, R., Fornasari, L., Rodier, J. S. and Agret, S. 1998. Field evaluation of natural enemies of Tamarix spp. in southern France. Biological Control 12: 164-170.

Stevens, L. E. 1986. The status of ecological research on tamarisk (Tamaricaceae: Tamarix ramosissima) in Arizona. Pp. 99-105 In: Kunzman, M. R., Johnson, R. R. and Bennett, P. S., editors. Tamarisk control in southwestern United States: Proceedings of tamarisk conference, University of Arizona, Tucson, September 2-3, 1987. Special Report No. 9. Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit/University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Stevens, L. E. and Ayers, T. J. 2000. Biogeographic patterns among the nonnative flora and vertebrate fauna of Grand Canyon. In: Tillman, B., editor. Nonnative species in the Sonoran Desert. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

Stromberg, J. C. and Chew, M. K. 1997. Herbaceous exotics in Arizona's riparian ecosystems. Desert Plants 13: 11.

Sudbrock, A. 1993. Tamarisk control I, Fighting back: An overview of the invasion, and a low-impact way of fighting it. Restoration Management Notes 11: 31-34.

Tyus, H. M. and Nikirk, N. J. 1990. Abundance, growth, and diet of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, in the Green and Yampa rivers, Colorado and Utah. Southwestern Naturalist 35: 188-198.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Invasive Species Program. <http://invasives.fws.gov/> 9/12/00.

Warren, D. K. and Turner, R. M. 1975. Saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) seed production, seedling establishment and response to inundation. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science 10: 135-144.

Water Resources Research Center. 2000. Southwest Riparian Expertise Directory: Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah. <http://ag.arizona.edu/AZWATER/main.html> 9/12/00.

Welsh, S. L. 1988. Zion National Park threatened and endangered and exotic plant surveys.Unpublished final report by Endangered Plant Studies, Inc. Contract No. CX 1590-7-0001., Zion National Park, UT.

Welsh, S. L., Atwood, N. D., Goodrich, S. and Higgins, L. C., editors. 1987. A Utah Flora. 9: 894 pp.

Williamson, R. R. and Tyler, C. F. 1932. Trout propagation in Grand Canyon National Park. Grand Canyon Nature Notes 7: 11-16.

Wilson, R. E. 1944. Tree planting and soil erosion control in the southwest. Journal of Forestry 42: 668-673.